↓ Skip to main content

Regulatory Aspects of Gene Therapy and Cell Therapy Products

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Regulation of Cell and Gene Therapy Medicinal Products in Taiwan
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Regulation of Cell and Gene Therapy Medicinal Products in Taiwan
Chapter number 10
Book title
Regulatory Aspects of Gene Therapy and Cell Therapy Products
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-18618-4_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-918617-7, 978-3-31-918618-4
Authors

Lin, Yi-Chu, Wang, Po-Yu, Tsai, Shih-Chih, Lin, Chien-Liang, Tai, Hsuen-Yung, Lo, Chi-Fang, Wu, Shiow-Ing, Chiang, Yu-Mei, Liu, Li-Ling, Yi-Chu Lin, Po-Yu Wang, Shih-Chih Tsai, Chien-Liang Lin, Hsuen-Yung Tai, Chi-Fang Lo, Shiow-Ing Wu, Yu-Mei Chiang, Li-Ling Liu

Abstract

Owing to the rapid and mature development of emerging biotechnology in the fields of cell culture, cell preservation, and recombinant DNA technology, more and more cell or gene medicinal therapy products have been approved for marketing, to treat serious diseases which have been challenging to treat with current medical practice or medicine. This chapter will briefly introduce the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration (TFDA) and elaborate regulation of cell and gene therapy medicinal products in Taiwan, including regulatory history evolution, current regulatory framework, application and review procedures, and relevant jurisdictional issues. Under the promise of quality, safety, and efficacy of medicinal products, it is expected the regulation and environment will be more flexible, streamlining the process of the marketing approval of new emerging cell or gene therapy medicinal products and providing diverse treatment options for physicians and patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,304,256
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,125
of 5,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,673
of 364,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#53
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.