↓ Skip to main content

Mass Vaccination: Global Aspects — Progress and Obstacles

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Universal mass vaccination against hepatitis A.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Universal mass vaccination against hepatitis A.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Mass Vaccination: Global Aspects — Progress and Obstacles
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/3-540-36583-4_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-029382-8, 978-3-54-036583-9
Authors

André FE, F. E. André, André, F. E.

Abstract

When first introduced in 1992 the hepatitis A vaccine was recommended for individuals at high risk of exposure. This policy was not expected to have a significant impact on disease incidence at population level in view of the epidemiology of the hepatitis A virus (HAV). More recently two countries, Israel and Bahrain, and regions or subpopulations in others (Australia, China, Byelorussia, Italy, Spain, US) have embarked upon more ambitious vaccination programmes that aim to immunize whole birth cohorts. After a brief survey of the virology and epidemiology of HAV, the disease burden it inflicts and a short history of the development of HAV vaccines--both live (in China) and killed vaccines are available--he vaccination programmes introduced in the countries mentioned above are described. The results have been spectacular: disease incidence, not only in the vaccinated cohorts but also in the whole population, have plummeted within a few years of the start of mass vaccination. There is now convincing evidence that the vaccine confers herd immunity if the main spreaders of the virus are targeted for immunization. This finding should encourage other countries to start mass vaccination programmes against HAV, particularly as pharmacoeconomic studies are beginning to show that such a strategy could be a cost-effective way of controlling the disease. It is now even conceivable to eradicate HAV. In fact, this should be easier to achieve than polio eradication as HAV vaccines confer more durable immunity than polio vaccines. However, the global disease burden of HAV is generally thought not to be high enough to justify such an undertaking in the foreseeable future.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#200
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,516
of 67,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.