↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary Disorders and Therapy

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 50: Intensity of Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Lung Cancer in Relation to Quality of Life
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Intensity of Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Lung Cancer in Relation to Quality of Life
Chapter number 50
Book title
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_50
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-973702-7, 978-3-31-973703-4
Authors

Polański, Jacek, Chabowski, Mariusz, Chudiak, Anna, Uchmanowicz, Bartosz, Janczak, Dariusz, Rosińczuk, Joanna, Mazur, Grzegorz, Jacek Polański, Mariusz Chabowski, Anna Chudiak, Bartosz Uchmanowicz, Dariusz Janczak, Joanna Rosińczuk, Grzegorz Mazur

Abstract

Psychological factors, such as the anxiety and depression, which often occur in patients with lung cancer might negatively influence their quality of life. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of anxiety and depression in lung cancer patients on quality of life. The study included 180 lung patients of the mean age of 62.7 ± 9.7 years. The following scales were employed in the study: Quality of Life Questionnaire QLQ-C30 and LC13 scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS). The overall score of quality of life measured by QLQ-C30 was 47.1 ± 23.4 points on a hundred-point scale. Anxiety was diagnosed in 67 patients (37.2%) and depression in 75 patients (41.7%) by HADS. Quality of life was significantly worse in case of anxiety and depression (p < 0.05), which negatively influenced both functional and symptom intensity scales measured with QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13. We conclude that early identification of anxiety and depression may help in therapeutic decision-making and may be a useful predictive factor in lung cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Professor 3 5%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Psychology 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 22 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,811,692
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,254
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,833
of 317,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#55
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.