You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Formulation development of antibody-drug conjugates.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 13 |
| Book title |
Antibody-Drug Conjugates
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-541-5_13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-540-8, 978-1-62703-541-5
|
| Authors |
Galush WJ, Wakankar AA, William J. Galush, Aditya A. Wakankar, Galush, William J., Wakankar, Aditya A. |
| Abstract |
Formulation development of an ADC resembles that of a conventional antibody, but the conjugated form introduces new molecular attributes such as drug-to-antibody ratio and stability of the drug itself that need to be considered. An extended set of analytical tools, coupled with understanding of how ADCs and conventional antibodies differ in terms of their stability, guides formulation selection. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 24% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,128,001
of 25,090,809 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,455
of 14,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,886
of 203,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#17
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,090,809 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.