↓ Skip to main content

Protein Reviews

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 58: Histone Post-Translational Modifications and Nucleosome Organisation in Transcriptional Regulation: Some Open Questions
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Histone Post-Translational Modifications and Nucleosome Organisation in Transcriptional Regulation: Some Open Questions
Chapter number 58
Book title
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_58
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-106921-5, 978-9-81-106922-2
Authors

Castillo, Josefa, López-Rodas, Gerardo, Franco, Luis, Josefa Castillo, Gerardo López-Rodas, Luis Franco

Abstract

The organisation of chromatin is first discussed to conclude that nucleosomes play both structural and transcription-regulatory roles. The presence of nucleosomes makes difficult the access of transcriptional factors to their target sequences and the action of RNA polymerases. The histone post-translational modifications and nucleosome remodelling are first discussed, from a historical point of view, as mechanisms to remove the obstacles imposed by chromatin structure to transcription. Instead of reviewing the state of the art of the whole field, this review is centred on some open questions. First, some "non-classical" histone modifications, such as short-chain acylations other than acetylation, are considered to conclude that their relationship with the concentration of metabolic intermediaries might make of them a sensor of the physiological state of the cells. Then attention is paid to the interest of studying chromatin organisation and epigenetic marks at a single nucleosome level as a complement to genome-wide approaches. Finally, as a consequence of the above questions, the review focuses on the presence of multiple histone post-translational modifications on a single nucleosome. The methods to detect them and their meaning, with special emphasis on bivalent marks, are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 26%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Professor 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 23%
Chemistry 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,466,074
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,515
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,945
of 316,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#59
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.