↓ Skip to main content

Osteochondral Tissue Engineering

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Osteochondral Tissue Engineering'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Advances for Treatment of Knee OC Defects
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Emerging Concepts in Treating Cartilage, Osteochondral Defects, and Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Ankle
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Osteoarthritis: Trauma vs Disease
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Surgical Treatment Paradigms of Ankle Lateral Instability, Osteochondral Defects and Impingement
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Clinical Management in Early OA
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Hyaluronic Acid
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Semi-IPN- and IPN-Based Hydrogels
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Promising Biomolecules
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Nanoparticles-Based Systems for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Stem Cells for Osteochondral Regeneration
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 PRP Therapy
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Enhancing Biological and Biomechanical Fixation of Osteochondral Scaffold: A Grand Challenge
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Combination of Polymeric Supports and Drug Delivery Systems for Osteochondral Regeneration
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Osteochondral Angiogenesis and Promoted Vascularization: New Therapeutic Target
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Models of Disease
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Tissue Engineering Strategies for Osteochondral Repair
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 In Vitro Mimetic Models for the Bone-Cartilage Interface Regeneration
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Bioreactors and Microfluidics for Osteochondral Interface Maturation
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Small Animal Models
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Large Animal Models for Osteochondral Regeneration
Attention for Chapter 20: Large Animal Models for Osteochondral Regeneration
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Large Animal Models for Osteochondral Regeneration
Chapter number 20
Book title
Osteochondral Tissue Engineering
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76735-2_20
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-976734-5, 978-3-31-976735-2
Authors

Isabel R. Dias, Carlos A. Viegas, Pedro P. Carvalho, Dias, Isabel R., Viegas, Carlos A., Carvalho, Pedro P.

Abstract

Namely, in the last two decades, large animal models - small ruminants (sheep and goats), pigs, dogs and horses - have been used to study the physiopathology and to develop new therapeutic procedures to treat human clinical osteoarthritis. For that purpose, cartilage and/or osteochondral defects are generally performed in the stifle joint of selected large animal models at the condylar and trochlear femoral areas where spontaneous regeneration should be excluded. Experimental animal care and protection legislation and guideline documents of the US Food and Drug Administration, the American Society for Testing and Materials and the International Cartilage Repair Society should be followed, and also the specificities of the animal species used for these studies must be taken into account, such as the cartilage thickness of the selected defect localization, the defined cartilage critical size defect and the joint anatomy in view of the post-operative techniques to be performed to evaluate the chondral/osteochondral repair. In particular, in the articular cartilage regeneration and repair studies with animal models, the subchondral bone plate should always be taken into consideration. Pilot studies for chondral and osteochondral bone tissue engineering could apply short observational periods for evaluation of the cartilage regeneration up to 12 weeks post-operatively, but generally a 6- to 12-month follow-up period is used for these types of studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 25 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Engineering 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 28 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,485,225
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,995
of 4,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,279
of 442,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#197
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.