↓ Skip to main content

Filaments in Bioprocesses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 300: Better One-Eyed than Blind—Challenges and Opportunities of Biomass Measurement During Solid-State Fermentation of Basidiomycetes
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Better One-Eyed than Blind—Challenges and Opportunities of Biomass Measurement During Solid-State Fermentation of Basidiomycetes
Chapter number 300
Book title
Filaments in Bioprocesses
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/10_2014_300
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-920510-6, 978-3-31-920511-3
Authors

Susanne Steudler, Thomas Bley, Steudler, Susanne, Bley, Thomas

Abstract

: Filamentous fungi, especially basidiomycetes, produce a wide range of metabolites, many of which have potential biotechnological and industrial applications. Solid-state fermentation (SSF) is very suitable for the cultivation of basidiomycetes since it mimics the natural habitat of these fungi. Some of the major advantages of SSF are the robustness of the process, the use of low-cost residual materials as substrates, and the reduced usage of water. However, monitoring key variables is difficult, which makes process control a challenge. Specifically, it is very difficult to determine the biomass during SSF process involving basidiomycetes. This is problematic, as the biomass is normally a key variable in mass and energy balance equations. Further, the success of fungal SSF processes is often evaluated, in part, based on the growth of the fungus. Direct determination of the dry weight of biomass is impossible and indirect quantification techniques must be used. Over the years, various determination techniques have been developed for the quantification of fungal biomass in SSF processes. The current review gives an overview of various direct and indirect biomass determination methods, discussing their advantages and disadvantages.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Engineering 3 11%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 30%