↓ Skip to main content

Network Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 41: Rigid-Docking Approaches to Explore Protein-Protein Interaction Space.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 216)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Rigid-Docking Approaches to Explore Protein-Protein Interaction Space.
Chapter number 41
Book title
Network Biology
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/10_2016_41
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-956459-3, 978-3-31-956460-9
Authors

Yuri Matsuzaki, Nobuyuki Uchikoga, Masahito Ohue, Yutaka Akiyama

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions play core roles in living cells, especially in the regulatory systems. As information on proteins has rapidly accumulated on publicly available databases, much effort has been made to obtain a better picture of protein-protein interaction networks using protein tertiary structure data. Predicting relevant interacting partners from their tertiary structure is a challenging task and computer science methods have the potential to assist with this. Protein-protein rigid docking has been utilized by several projects, docking-based approaches having the advantages that they can suggest binding poses of predicted binding partners which would help in understanding the interaction mechanisms and that comparing docking results of both non-binders and binders can lead to understanding the specificity of protein-protein interactions from structural viewpoints. In this review we focus on explaining current computational prediction methods to predict pairwise direct protein-protein interactions that form protein complexes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Other 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Engineering 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,825,287
of 23,750,517 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#29
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,278
of 314,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,750,517 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them