You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Physical and Chemical Dissolution Front Instability in Porous Media
|
---|---|
Published by |
ADS, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-08461-9 |
ISBNs |
978-3-31-908460-2, 978-3-31-908461-9
|
Authors |
Zhao, Chongbin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
Mathematics | 1 | 10% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#5,105,739
of 26,438,498 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#3,075
of 26,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,393
of 240,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#51
of 555 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,438,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 555 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.