↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Effectiveness in Surgical Oncology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: Comparative Effectiveness in Colon and Rectal Cancer.
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Comparative Effectiveness in Colon and Rectal Cancer.
Chapter number 9
Book title
Comparative Effectiveness in Surgical Oncology
Published in
Cancer treatment and research, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12553-4_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-912552-7, 978-3-31-912553-4
Authors

Christine C Jensen, Robert D Madoff, Christine C. Jensen, Robert D. Madoff

Abstract

Treatment of colorectal cancer is becoming more uniform, with wider acceptance of standardized guidelines. However, areas of controversy exist where the appropriate treatment is not clear, including: should a segmental colectomy or a more extensive resection be performed in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer? should an asymptomatic primary cancer be resected in the presence of unresectable metastatic disease? what is the role of extended lymph node resection in colon and rectal cancer? are there clinically significant benefits for a robotic approach to colorectal resection versus a laparoscopic approach? This chapter will examine these issues and discuss how they may be resolved.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%