You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
LoopWeaver – Loop Modeling by the Weighted Scaling of Verified Proteins
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 11 |
Book title |
Research in Computational Molecular Biology
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-29627-7_11 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-229626-0, 978-3-64-229627-7
|
Authors |
Daniel Holtby, Shuai Cheng Li, Ming Li, Holtby, Daniel, Li, Shuai Cheng, Li, Ming |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 33% |
Other | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,486
of 8,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,758
of 162,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.