↓ Skip to main content

Human Monoclonal Antibodies

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Human Monoclonal Antibodies'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Human Monoclonal Antibodies: The Residual Challenge of Antibody Immunogenicity
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Technical and Ethical Limitations in Making Human Monoclonal Antibodies (An Overview)
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Therapeutic human monoclonal antibodies in inflammatory diseases.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Therapeutic Human Monoclonal Antibodies Against Cancer
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Polyclonal and Monoclonal Antibodies in Clinic
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Production of Human Monoclonal Antibodies by the Epstein–Barr Virus Method
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Humanization and Simultaneous Optimization of Monoclonal Antibody
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Chimeric Antibodies
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Recombinant Genetic Libraries and Human Monoclonal Antibodies
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Production of Stabilized scFv Antibody Fragments in the E. coli Bacterial Cytoplasm
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Construction and Production of an IgG-Like Tetravalent Bispecific Antibody, IgG-Single-Chain Fv Fusion.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Construction of Human Antibody Gene Libraries and Selection of Antibodies by Phage Display
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Antigen-specific human monoclonal antibodies from transgenic mice.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Phage Display Technology for Human Monoclonal Antibodies
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Antigen-Specific In Vitro Immunization: A Source for Human Monoclonal Antibodies
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Methods for Radiolabelling of Monoclonal Antibodies
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Purification of human monoclonal antibodies and their fragments.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Idiotype-Specific Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) for Therapy of Autoimmune Diseases
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Erratum
Attention for Chapter 11: Construction and Production of an IgG-Like Tetravalent Bispecific Antibody, IgG-Single-Chain Fv Fusion.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Construction and Production of an IgG-Like Tetravalent Bispecific Antibody, IgG-Single-Chain Fv Fusion.
Chapter number 11
Book title
Human Monoclonal Antibodies
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-586-6_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-585-9, 978-1-62703-586-6
Authors

Dan Lu, Zhenping Zhu, Lu, Dan, Zhu, Zhenping

Abstract

In recent years, both laboratory and clinical studies have demonstrated that bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) may have significant potential application in cancer therapy either by targeting tumor cells with cytotoxic agents including effector cells, radionuclides, drugs, and toxins, or by simultaneously blocking two tumor-associated targets, e.g., tumor growth factors and/or their cell surface receptors. A major obstacle in the development of BsAb has been the difficulty of producing the materials in sufficient quality and quantity by traditional technologies such as the hybrid hybridoma and chemical conjugation methods. The development of recombinant BsAbs as therapeutic agents will depend heavily on the advances made in the design of the constructs (or formats) and production efficiency. Here we describe a recombinant method for the construction and production of a tetravalent IgG-like BsAb molecule, IgG-scFv fusion, in which, a single-chain Fv (scFv) antibody fragment of one antigen specificity is genetically fused to the c-terminal of a conventional IgG of a different antigen specificity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 42%
Researcher 4 33%
Student > Master 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2013.
All research outputs
#18,347,414
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,857
of 13,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,256
of 305,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#293
of 594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,084 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.