↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial Biofilms

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Biofilm Development with an Emphasis on Bacillus subtilis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Biofilm Development with an Emphasis on Bacillus subtilis
Chapter number 1
Book title
Bacterial Biofilms
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-075417-6, 978-3-54-075418-3
Authors

Lemon KP, Earl AM, Vlamakis HC, Aguilar C, Kolter R, K. P. Lemon, A. M. Earl, H. C. Vlamakis, C. Aguilar, R. Kolter, Lemon, K. P., Earl, A. M., Vlamakis, H. C., Aguilar, C., Kolter, R.

Abstract

Our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in biofilm formation has increased tremendously in recent years. From research on diverse bacteria, a general model of bacterial biofilm development has emerged. This model can be adjusted to fit either of two common modes of unicellular existence: nonmotile and motile. Here we provide a detailed review of what is currently known about biofilm formation by the motile bacterium Bacillus subtilis. While the ability of bacteria to form a biofilm appears to be almost universal and overarching themes apply, the combination of molecular events necessary varies widely, and this is reflected in the other chapters of this book.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 256 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 26%
Researcher 51 19%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 52 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 8%
Engineering 13 5%
Physics and Astronomy 10 4%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 53 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,856,450
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#140
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,800
of 155,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.