You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Identification of Human Eosinophils in Whole Blood by Flow Cytometry
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
Eosinophils
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1016-8_8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1015-1, 978-1-4939-1016-8
|
| Authors |
Caroline Ethier, Paige Lacy, Francis Davoine, Ethier, Caroline, Lacy, Paige, Davoine, Francis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#13,901,523
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,905
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,205
of 306,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#154
of 589 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 589 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.