You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Drawing Programs: The Theory and Practice of Schematic Functional Programming
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
ADS, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-84882-618-2 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-84882-619-9, 978-1-84882-618-2
|
| Authors |
Addis, Tom, Addis, Jan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 4 | 31% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,438,092
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,271
of 37,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,943
of 94,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#82
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,302 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.