↓ Skip to main content

Urinary Tract

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Urinary Tract'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Urinary Tract
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Animal Models in Overactive Bladder Research
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Animal Models of Stress Urinary Incontinence
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Animal Models for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Use of Functional Imaging to Monitor Central Control of Voiding in Humans
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Neuroanatomy of the lower urinary tract.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Anatomy and Histology of the Lower Urinary Tract
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Neurophysiology of the Lower Urinary Tract
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Afferent Mechanism in the Urinary Tract
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Urothelial Signaling
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Interstitial Cells of Cajal in the Urinary Tract
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Potential Applications of Gene Therapy/Transfer to the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Diseases/Disorders
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Specific Pharmacokinetic Aspects of the Urinary Tract
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 α 1 -Adrenoceptors in the Urinary Tract
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 β-Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes in the Urinary Tract
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Urinary Tract
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Modulation of Urinary Bladder Innervation: TRPV1 and Botulinum Toxin A
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Ion Channel Modulators and Urinary Tract Function
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Neuropeptides in lower urinary tract function.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Urinary Tract
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Vasopressin Receptors in Voiding Dysfunction
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 ATP and P2X Purinoceptors in Urinary Tract Disorders
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Cyclic Nucleotide Metabolism Including Nitric Oxide and Phosphodiesterase-Related Targets in the Lower Urinary Tract
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Rho-Kinase, a Common Final Path of Various Contractile Bladder and Ureter Stimuli
Attention for Chapter 19: Neuropeptides in lower urinary tract function.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Neuropeptides in lower urinary tract function.
Chapter number 19
Book title
Urinary Tract
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-16499-6_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-216498-9, 978-3-64-216499-6
Authors

Lauren Arms, Margaret A. Vizzard, Arms, Lauren, Vizzard, Margaret A.

Abstract

Numerous neuropeptide/receptor systems including vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P, neurokinin A, bradykinin, and endothelin-1 are expressed in the lower urinary tract (LUT) in both neural and nonneural (e.g., urothelium) components. LUT neuropeptide immunoreactivity is present in afferent and autonomic efferent neurons innervating the bladder and urethra and in the urothelium of the urinary bladder. Neuropeptides have tissue-specific distributions and functions in the LUT and exhibit neuroplastic changes in expression and function with LUT dysfunction following neural injury, inflammation, and disease. LUT dysfunction with abnormal voiding, including urinary urgency, increased voiding frequency, nocturia, urinary incontinence, and pain, may reflect a change in the balance of neuropeptides in bladder reflex pathways. LUT neuropeptide/receptor systems may represent potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 30%
Neuroscience 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,237,301
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#392
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,031
of 180,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.