You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Neuropharmacology and Aging
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 10 |
| Book title |
Pharmacological Intervention in the Aging Process
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 1978
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4684-7793-1_10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4684-7795-5, 978-1-4684-7793-1
|
| Authors |
A. Horita, Horita, A. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#20,433,667
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,985
of 4,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,669
of 25,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.