You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Amphipols and Fluorinated Surfactants: Two Alternatives to Detergents for Studying Membrane Proteins In vitro
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-60761-344-2_14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-60761-343-5, 978-1-60761-344-2
|
| Authors |
Cécile Breyton, Bernard Pucci, Jean-Luc Popot, Breyton, Cécile, Pucci, Bernard, Popot, Jean-Luc |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 24% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,211,576
of 24,150,351 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,484
of 13,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,382
of 170,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#91
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,150,351 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.