↓ Skip to main content

Planar Cell Polarity

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Planar Cell Polarity'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Live Imaging of Drosophila Embryos: Quantifying Protein Numbers and Dynamics at Subcellular Locations
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Analyzing Frizzled Signaling Using Fixed and Live Imaging of the Asymmetric Cell Division of the Drosophila Sensory Organ Precursor Cell
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Protein–Protein Interaction Techniques: Dissect PCP Signaling in Xenopus
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Cuticle Refraction Microscopy: A Rapid and Simple Method for Imaging Drosophila Wing Topography, an Alternative Readout of Wing Planar Cell Polarity
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Analysis of Cell Shape and Polarity During Zebrafish Gastrulation
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Analyzing Planar Cell Polarity During Zebrafish Gastrulation
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Wnt/Planar Cell Polarity Signaling in the Regulation of Convergent Extension Movements During Xenopus Gastrulation
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Using 32-Cell Stage Xenopus Embryos to Probe PCP Signaling.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Planar Cell Polarity
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Activation and Function of Small GTPases Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 During Gastrulation
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Convergent Extension Analysis in Mouse Whole Embryo Culture
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Analysis of PCP Defects in Mammalian Eye Lens
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Examining Planar Cell Polarity in the Mammalian Cochlea
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Role of Prickle1 and Prickle2 in Neurite Outgrowth in Murine Neuroblastoma Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Planar Cell Polarity Pathway and Parietal Endoderm Cell Migration
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Analysis of Wnt/Planar Cell Polarity Pathway in Cultured Cells
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Regulation of Focal Adhesion Dynamics by Wnt5a Signaling
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Embryonic Mouse Gut Tube as a Model for Analysis of Epithelial Polarity
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Assessing PCP in the Cochlea of Mammalian Ciliopathy Models.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Morphometric Analysis of Centrosome Position in Tissues
Attention for Chapter 8: Using 32-Cell Stage Xenopus Embryos to Probe PCP Signaling.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Using 32-Cell Stage Xenopus Embryos to Probe PCP Signaling.
Chapter number 8
Book title
Planar Cell Polarity
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-510-7_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-509-1, 978-1-61779-510-7
Authors

Lee HS, Sokol SY, Moody SA, Daar IO, Hyun-Shik Lee, Sergei Y. Sokol, Sally A. Moody, Ira O. Daar

Abstract

Use of loss-of function (via antisense Morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs)) or over-expression of proteins in epithelial cells during early embryogenesis of Xenopus embryos, can be a powerful tool to understand how signaling molecules can affect developmental events. The techniques described here are useful for examining the roles of proteins in cell-cell adhesion, and planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling in cell movement. We describe how to target specific regions within the embryos by injecting an RNA encoding a tracer molecule along with RNA encoding your protein of interest or an antisense MO to knock-down a particular protein within a specific blastomere of the embryo. Effects on cell-cell adhesion, cell movement, and endogenous or exogenous protein localization can be assessed at later stages in specific targeted tissues using fluorescent microscopy and immunolocalization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 29%
Unknown 5 71%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Master 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,259
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,280
of 13,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,127
of 244,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#263
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,020 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.