↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Neurobiology of the Endocannabinoid System

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 14: Role of Endocannabinoid Signaling in Anxiety and Depression
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Role of Endocannabinoid Signaling in Anxiety and Depression
Chapter number 14
Book title
Behavioral Neurobiology of the Endocannabinoid System
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-88955-7_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-088954-0, 978-3-54-088955-7
Authors

Patel S, Hillard CJ, Sachin Patel, Cecilia J. Hillard, Patel, Sachin, Hillard, Cecilia J.

Abstract

Cannabinoid receptors and their endogenous ligands are located throughout the limbic, or "emotional," brain, where they modulate synaptic neurotransmission. Converging preclinical and clinical data suggest a role for endogenous cannabinoid signaling in the modulation of anxiety and depression. Augmentation of endocannabinoid signaling (ECS) has anxiolytic effects, whereas blockade or genetic deletion of CB₁ receptors has anxiogenic properties. Augmentation of ECS also appears to have anti-depressant actions, and in some assays blockade and genetic deletion of CB₁ receptors produces depressive phenotypes. These data provide evidence that ECS serves in an anxiolytic, and possibly anti-depressant, role. These data suggest novel approaches to treatment of affective disorders which could include enhancement of endogenous cannabinoid signaling, and warrant cautious use of CB₁ receptor antagonists in patients with pre-existing affective disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 11 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 32 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 16 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 37 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,072,513
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#94
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,743
of 183,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them