You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Three computational tools for predicting bacterial essential genes.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 13 |
Book title |
Gene Essentiality
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2398-4_13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2397-7, 978-1-4939-2398-4
|
Authors |
Guo FB, Ye YN, Ning LW, Wei W, Feng-Biao Guo, Yuan-Nong Ye, Lu-Wen Ning, Wen Wei, Guo, Feng-Biao, Ye, Yuan-Nong, Ning, Lu-Wen, Wei, Wen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Professor | 2 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
Researcher | 2 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 18% |
Computer Science | 3 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 12% |
Chemistry | 2 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,319
of 13,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,712
of 353,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#168
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.