↓ Skip to main content

High-Dimensional Single Cell Analysis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 354: High-Dimensional Analysis of Human CD8(+) T Cell Phenotype, Function, and Antigen Specificity.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
High-Dimensional Analysis of Human CD8(+) T Cell Phenotype, Function, and Antigen Specificity.
Chapter number 354
Book title
High-Dimensional Single Cell Analysis
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/82_2013_354
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-254826-0, 978-3-64-254827-7
Authors

Evan W Newell, Wenyu Lin, Evan W. Newell, Newell, Evan W., Lin, Wenyu

Abstract

Antigen-specific T cells are critical initiators and orchestrators of the adaptive immune response. Categorizing antigen-specific T cell subsets is not a simple task given the diversity of these cells and the large number of parameters that can be considered. Here, we focus on human CD8(+) T cells and discuss the utility of high-dimensional mass cytometric analysis techniques for the concurrent identification and characterization of antigen-specific T cells involved in immunological homeostasis and disease. We first provide an overview of previously identified T cell subsets. We then discuss the segregation of antigen-specific T cells based on protein expression through surface and/or intracellular staining, on functional capacity through measurement expression of cytokines or other inducible markers, and on the antigen-specificity of the cell assessed using peptide-major histocompatibility complex multimers. High-dimensional mass cytometry enables a deeper and more integrated view of all three aspects of antigen-specific T cell diversity than do traditional techniques. Use of mass cytometry for precise measurement of the status of antigen-specific immune responses should result in better prediction of vaccine efficacy and disease outcomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 18%
Other 2 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 23%
Engineering 3 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,387,830
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#105
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,654
of 207,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them