↓ Skip to main content

Foundations and Practice of Security

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Foundations and Practice of Security'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 On the Efficiency of Mathematics in Intrusion Detection: The NetEntropy Case
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 On the Feasibility of a Censorship Resistant Decentralized Name System
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 A General Framework for Group Authentication and Key Exchange Protocols
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Modelling Simultaneous Mutual Authentication for Authenticated Key Exchange
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Model-Based Specification and Validation of Security and Dependability Patterns
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Enforcing Information Flow by Combining Static and Dynamic Analysis
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Fault Injection to Reverse Engineer DES-Like Cryptosystems
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Software Camouflage
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Investigation of Parameters Influencing the Success of Optical Fault Attacks
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 ONTIDS: A Highly Flexible Context-Aware and Ontology-Based Alert Correlation Framework
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Quantitative Evaluation of Enforcement Strategies
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Collusion Resistant Inference Control for Cadastral Databases
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Leveraging Ontologies upon a Holistic Privacy-Aware Access Control Model
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Formal Modelling of Content-Based Protection and Release for Access Control in NATO Operations
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Computational Soundness of Symbolic Blind Signatures under Active Attacker
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Improved Davies-Murphy’s Attack on DES Revisited
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Yet Another Fault-Based Leakage in Non-uniform Faulty Ciphertexts
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A Hierarchical Anti-Counterfeit Mechanism: Securing the Supply Chain Using RFIDs
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 A More Realistic Model for Verifying Route Validity in Ad-Hoc Networks
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 On the Security of a Privacy-Preserving Key Management Scheme for Location Based Services in VANETs
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 CheR: Cheating Resilience in the Cloud via Smart Resource Allocation
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Evaluation of Software-Oriented Block Ciphers on Smartphones
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Don’t Push It: Breaking iButton Security
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Discovering Flaws in IDS Through Analysis of Their Inputs
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 On the Reverse Engineering of the Citadel Botnet
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 The Carna Botnet Through the Lens of a Network Telescope
Attention for Chapter 25: On the Reverse Engineering of the Citadel Botnet
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
On the Reverse Engineering of the Citadel Botnet
Chapter number 25
Book title
Foundations and Practice of Security
Published in
arXiv, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05302-8_25
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-905301-1, 978-3-31-905302-8
Authors

Ashkan Rahimian, Raha Ziarati, Stere Preda, Mourad Debbabi, Rahimian, Ashkan, Ziarati, Raha, Preda, Stere, Debbabi, Mourad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Student > Master 5 19%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 19 73%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,520,705
of 24,489,051 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#23,356
of 986,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,208
of 233,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#115
of 10,485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,489,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 986,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10,485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.