↓ Skip to main content

Quadruplex Nucleic Acids

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 350: Higher-Order Quadruplex Structures.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Higher-Order Quadruplex Structures.
Chapter number 350
Book title
Quadruplex Nucleic Acids
Published in
Topics in current chemistry, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/128_2012_350
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-234742-9, 978-3-64-234743-6
Authors

Petraccone L, Luigi Petraccone, Petraccone, Luigi

Abstract

Structural studies have shown that four G-tracts along a DNA strand are the minimal requirement for intramolecular G-quadruplex formation. Longer DNA sequences containing multiples of four G-tracts could, in principle, form higher-order structures based on multiple G-quadruplex blocks. This latter condition is abundantly verified for the telomeric single-stranded overhang (~200 nt) consisting of tens of TTAGGG repeats, thus opening new interesting questions about the structure of the "real" telomeric DNA. How many quadruplex units form in the human telomeric overhang? Which type of quadruplex topologies? Do they interact or not? What about their binding properties? Although many of these questions are still unanswered, recent experimental and computational studies have begun to address them. The existence and relevance of these higher-order quadruplex structures in the human genome is now an interesting and stimulating research topic in the quadruplex field. The recent results, the unsolved problems, and the future prospects for understanding higher-order telomeric quadruplex structures are the main topics of this review. Other studies on long telomeric RNA sequences and on other intramolecular (non telomeric) DNA higher order quadruplex structures are also presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 36%
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 39%
Chemistry 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Materials Science 2 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,310,549
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Topics in current chemistry
#117
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,778
of 164,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Topics in current chemistry
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.