↓ Skip to main content

Machine Learning and Interpretation in Neuroimaging

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: Estimating Learning Effects: A Short-Time Fourier Transform Regression Model for MEG Source Localization
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Estimating Learning Effects: A Short-Time Fourier Transform Regression Model for MEG Source Localization
Chapter number 8
Book title
Machine Learning and Interpretation in Neuroimaging
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45174-9_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-945173-2, 978-3-31-945174-9
Authors

Yang, Ying, Tarr, Michael J., Kass, Robert E., Ying Yang, Michael J. Tarr, Robert E. Kass

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has a high temporal resolution well-suited for studying perceptual learning. However, to identify where learning happens in the brain, one needs to apply source localization techniques to project MEG sensor data into brain space. Previous source localization methods, such as the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) method by Gramfort et al.([6]) produced intriguing results, but they were not designed to incorporate trial-by-trial learning effects. Here we modify the approach in [6] to produce an STFT-based source localization method (STFT-R) that includes an additional regression of the STFT components on covariates such as the behavioral learning curve. We also exploit a hierarchical L21 penalty to induce structured sparsity of STFT components and to emphasize signals from regions of interest (ROIs) that are selected according to prior knowledge. In reconstructing the ROI source signals from simulated data, STFT-R achieved smaller errors than a two-step method using the popular minimum-norm estimate (MNE), and in a real-world human learning experiment, STFT-R yielded more interpretable results about what time-frequency components of the ROI signals were correlated with learning.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 22%
Computer Science 2 22%
Engineering 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Linguistics 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%