You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Adapting Aerial Root Classifier Missing Data Processor in Data Stream Decision Tree Classification
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 10 |
Book title |
Model and Data Engineering
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-11587-0_10 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-911586-3, 978-3-31-911587-0
|
Authors |
Oussama Lachiheb, Mohamed Salah Gouider |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 100% |
Student > Master | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 100% |
Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,238,443
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#6,982
of 8,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,700
of 252,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#245
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.