↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 239

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Important Issues in Ecotoxicological Investigations Using Earthworms
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Important Issues in Ecotoxicological Investigations Using Earthworms
Chapter number 4
Book title
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 239
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/398_2016_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-933971-9, 978-3-31-933972-6
Authors

Velki, Mirna, Ečimović, Sandra, Mirna Velki, Sandra Ečimović

Abstract

The importance and beneficial effects of earthworms on soil structure and quality is well-established. In addition, earthworms have proved to be important model organisms for investigation of pollutant effects on soil ecosystems. In ecotoxicological investigations effects of various pollutants on earthworms were assessed. But some important issues regarding the effects of pollutants on earthworms still need to be comprehensively addressed. In this review several issues relevant to soil ecotoxicological investigations using earthworms are emphasized and guidelines that should be adopted in ecotoxicological investigations using earthworms are given. The inclusion of these guidelines in ecotoxicological studies will contribute to the better quantification of impacts of pollutants and will allow more accurate prediction of the real field effects of pollutants to earthworms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 28%
Environmental Science 4 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#21,500,020
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#163
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,472
of 308,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.