Chapter title |
Small RNA library construction from minute biological samples.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 10 |
Book title |
PIWI-Interacting RNAs
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-694-8_10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-693-1, 978-1-62703-694-8
|
Authors |
Jessica A Matts, Yuliya Sytnikova, Gung-Wei Chirn, Gabor L Igloi, Nelson C Lau, Jessica A. Matts, Gung-wei Chirn, Gabor L. Igloi, Nelson C. Lau, Matts, Jessica A., Sytnikova, Yuliya, Chirn, Gung-wei, Igloi, Gabor L., Lau, Nelson C. |
Abstract |
Increasingly, the discovery and characterization of small regulatory RNAs from a variety of organisms have all required deep-sequencing methodologies. However, the crux to successful deep-sequencing analysis depends upon optimal construction of a cDNA library compatible for the high-throughput sequencing platform. Challenges to small RNA library constructions arise when dealing with minute tissue samples because certain structural RNA fragments can dominate and mask the desired characterization of regulatory small RNAs like microRNAs (miRNAs), endogenous small interfering RNAs (endo-siRNAs), and Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs). Here, we describe methods that improve the chances of constructing a successful library from small RNAs isolated from minute tissues such as enriched follicle cells from the Drosophila ovarium. Because the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) fragments are frequently the major contaminants in small RNA preparations from minute amounts of tissue, we demonstrate the utility of antisense oligonucleotide depletion and an acryloylaminophenylboronic acid (APB) polyacrylamide gel system for separating the abundant 2S rRNA in Drosophila from endo-siRNAs and piRNAs. Finally, our methodology generates libraries amenable to multiplex sequencing on the Illumina Hi-Seq platform. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
India | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 21% |
Researcher | 3 | 21% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 43% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |