↓ Skip to main content

Advances in Clinical Science

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 155: Usage of Over-the-Counter and Herbal Products in Common Cold in Poland: Findings from Consumer Survey
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Usage of Over-the-Counter and Herbal Products in Common Cold in Poland: Findings from Consumer Survey
Chapter number 155
Book title
Advances in Clinical Science
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/5584_2015_155
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-921496-2, 978-3-31-921497-9
Authors

K. Karlowicz-Bodalska, K. Miśkiewicz, D. Kurpas, S. Han, A. Kowalczyk, D. Marciniak, A. Dryś, T. Glomb, S. Cedzich, U. Broniecka, E. Kuchar

Abstract

Upper respiratory tract infections are usually self-treated with synthetic and herbal over-the-counter products. The aim of the study was to assess the reasons for the purchase of those medications in Poland. We examined 413 adults, aged 18 and over (70.5 % of them were women) using a questionnaire. The findings demonstrate that oral synthetic products were used by 76 % of respondents, while herbal products by 30 %. Synthetic products were used mainly by educated people under 65 years of age, students, and the employed. Herbal products were used mainly by older people. In conclusion, synthetic products against common cold are perceived as more effective. Such medications are used by people who probably would like to recover and return to professional activity as quickly as possible. As they generally use more medications, they are at increased risk of adverse effects resulting from drug interactions, and they should be a target group for health education programs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Other 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 13 48%