↓ Skip to main content

Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: A Review.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: A Review.
Chapter number 5
Book title
Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery
Published in
Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-21359-0_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-921358-3, 978-3-31-921359-0
Authors

Maimon, Shimon, Luckman, Yehudit, Strauss, Ido, Shimon Maimon, Yehudit Luckman, Ido Strauss

Abstract

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) is a rare disease, the etiology of which is not entirely clear. It is the most common vascular malformation of the spinal cord, comprising 60-80 % of the cases. The clinical presentation and imaging findings may be nonspecific and misleading, often mistaking it for other entities like demyelinating or degenerative diseases of the spine.This chapter describes the imaging findings, clinical signs, and symptoms of this disease and also the available treatment options according to the current literature.Angiography is still considered the gold standard for diagnosis; however, MRI/MRA is increasingly used as a screening tool. Modern endovascular techniques are becoming increasingly more effective in treating SDAVF offering a less invasive treatment option; however, they still lag behind surgical success rates which approach 100 %. The outcome of both treatment options is similar if complete obliteration of the fistula is obtained and depends mainly on the severity of neurological dysfunction before treatment.Heightened awareness by radiologists and clinicians to this rare entity is essential to make a timely diagnosis of this treatable disease. A multidisciplinary treatment approach is required in order to make appropriate treatment decisions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 14%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 23 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 46%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,687,357
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery
#9
of 25 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,885
of 405,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.