You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 28 |
| Book title |
WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-36065-7_28 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-236064-0, 978-3-64-236065-7
|
| Authors |
Subir Kumar Ghosh, Takeshi Tokuyama, Hooman Reisi Dehkordi, Quan Nguyen, Peter Eades, Seok-Hee Hong, Reisi Dehkordi, Hooman, Nguyen, Quan, Eades, Peter, Hong, Seok-Hee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,432,447
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,490
of 8,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,168
of 280,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#100
of 314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.