↓ Skip to main content

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Protocols'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Laboratory Aspects of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Case Studies.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Rapid methods for detection of MRSA in clinical specimens.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Immunofluorescence Microscopy for the Detection of Surface Antigens in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS)-PCR Identification of MRSA.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Typing of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) of Staphylococcus aureus
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) Analysis of MRSA.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Genetic Interruption of Target Genes for Investigation of Virulence Factors
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Molecular Analysis of Staphylococcal Superantigens
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Investigation of Staphylococcus aureus Adhesion and Invasion of Host Cells
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Investigation of Biofilm Formation in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Transcriptomic Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus Using Microarray and Advanced Next-Generation RNA-seq Technologies.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Proteomic Approach to Investigate Pathogenicity and Metabolism of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Metabolomic Investigation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Treatment of Infections Due to Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Anti-infective Drug Development for MRSA.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Animal Models in Drug Development for MRSA.
Attention for Chapter 3: Rapid methods for detection of MRSA in clinical specimens.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Rapid methods for detection of MRSA in clinical specimens.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-664-1_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-663-4, 978-1-62703-664-1
Authors

Elizabeth L Palavecino, Elizabeth L. Palavecino, Palavecino, Elizabeth L.

Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility test methods such as disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and oxacillin screen plate require 24 h of incubation after having the organism growing in pure culture. Rapid and accurate identification of MRSA isolates is essential not only for patient care, but also for effective infection control programs to limit the spread of MRSA. In the last few years, several commercial rapid tests for detection of MRSA directly from nasal swabs and blood cultures have been developed for use in clinical laboratories. Real-time PCR and other molecular tests are gaining popularity as MRSA screening tests to identify patients who are candidates for contact precaution at the time of admission decreasing the risk for nosocomial transmission. These new methodologies have the advantage of a lower turnaround time than that of traditional culture and susceptibility testing and they are capable of detecting MRSA directly from nasal or wound swabs allowing rapid identification of colonized or infected patients. In addition, molecular methods able to detect and differentiate S. aureus and MRSA (SA/MRSA) directly from blood cultures are becoming a useful tool for rapid detection of bacteremia caused by MSSA and MRSA. This review focuses on the procedures for performing testing using rapid methods currently available for detection of MRSA directly from clinical specimens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 28 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,207,295
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,856
of 13,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,703
of 305,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#402
of 594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,085 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.