↓ Skip to main content

Opioid Receptors

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Opioid Receptors'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Overview of genetic analysis of human opioid receptors.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Computational Structural Biology of Opioid Receptors
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Analysis of epigenetic mechanisms regulating opioid receptor gene transcription.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Renilla Luciferase Reporter Assay to Study 3′UTR-Driven Posttranscriptional Regulations of OPRM1
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 High-throughput gene expression profiling of opioid-induced alterations in discrete brain areas.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Real-Time Imaging of Mu Opioid Receptors by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 In Vivo Techniques to Investigate the Internalization Profile of Opioid Receptors
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Monitoring Opioid Receptor Dimerization in Living Cells by Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET)
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) to Detect the Interactions Between Kappa Opioid Receptor and Non visual Arrestins
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Identification and Verification of Proteins Interacting with the Kappa Opioid Receptor (KOPR)
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Detection of Mu Opioid Receptor (MOPR) and Its Glycosylation in Rat and Mouse Brains by Western Blot with Anti-μC, an Affinity-Purified Polyclonal Anti-MOPR Antibody
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Immunohistochemical Analysis of Opioid Receptors in Peripheral Tissues
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 [ 35 S]GTPγS Autoradiography for Studies of Opioid Receptor Functionality
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Fluorescence-Based, High-Throughput Assays for μ-Opioid Receptor Activation Using a Membrane Potential-Sensitive Dye.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Analysis of Potassium and Calcium Imaging to Assay the Function of Opioid Receptors
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Electrophysiological Patch Clamp Assay to Monitor the Action of Opioid Receptors
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Skin-nerve preparation to assay the function of opioid receptors in peripheral endings of sensory neurons.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Mechanical Nociception Measurement in Mice and Rats with Automated Von Frey Equipment
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Detecting Zinc Release Induced by Mu-Opioid Receptor Agonists in Brain Slices
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Opioid Receptors: Methods for Detection and Their Modes of Actions in the Eye
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Evaluation of murine macrophage cytokine production after in vivo morphine treatment.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Measurement of macrophage toll-like receptor 4 expression after morphine treatment.
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 The Role of Opioid Receptors in Migration and Wound Recovery In Vitro in Cultured Human Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Role of Opioid Receptors in the Reinstatement of Opioid-Seeking Behavior: An Overview
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Analysis of Opioid-Seeking Reinstatement in the Rat
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Induction of a high alcohol consumption in rats and mice: role of opioid receptors.
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Evaluation of Social and Nonsocial Behaviors Mediated by Opioids in Mouse Pups
Attention for Chapter 3: Analysis of epigenetic mechanisms regulating opioid receptor gene transcription.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Analysis of epigenetic mechanisms regulating opioid receptor gene transcription.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Opioid Receptors
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1708-2_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-1707-5, 978-1-4939-1708-2
Authors

Cheol Kyu Hwang, Yadav Wagley, Ping-Yee Law, Li-Na Wei, Horace H Loh, Horace H. Loh, Hwang, Cheol Kyu, Wagley, Yadav, Law, Ping-Yee, Wei, Li-Na, Loh, Horace H.

Abstract

Opioid drugs are generally used for moderate and severe pain reductions which act through opioid receptors. Studies on transcriptional regulation of opioid receptors are still invaluable because not only transcription is the first step to produce protein products in cells, but the receptor transcription levels also affect the pain reduction by opioids, as observed in studies of heterozygous opioid receptor knockout mice.There are growing evidences that epigenetic regulation has played significant roles in transcriptional regulation of genes, including opioid receptors. In general, epigenetic mechanisms include three main regulatory factors: DNA methylation, chromatin modification, and noncoding RNAs (such as microRNA). From previous studies of ours and others on opioid receptors, those epigenetic factors were clearly involved in regulating opioid receptor expression in vivo and in vitro. In this chapter, among those three techniques we describe more details of DNA methylation methods because of emerging concepts of DNA methylation with the recent discovery of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine converting enzyme, TET1. Another analytical method of the epigenetic factors, chromatin modification, will be described briefly and information of analyzing noncoding RNAs is briefly mentioned in Subheading 1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Computer Science 2 15%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,306,972
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,319
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,763
of 352,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#343
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.