You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Preparation of Thin Frozen Sections from Nonfixed and Undecalcified Hard Tissues Using Kawamot’s Film Method (2012)
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 11 |
| Book title |
Skeletal Development and Repair
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-989-5_11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-988-8, 978-1-62703-989-5
|
| Authors |
Tadafumi Kawamoto, Komei Kawamoto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 18% |
| Engineering | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,832,538
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,408
of 13,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,764
of 307,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#64
of 591 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,332 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 591 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.