↓ Skip to main content

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Hematopoietic Stem Cell Protocols'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The Expanding Tool Kit for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Research
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Isolation of Quiescent Murine Hematopoietic Stem Cells by Homing Properties
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Hematopoietic Stem Cell Protocols
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Transmigration of Human CD34 + Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Flow Cytometry-Based Cell Cycle Measurement of Mouse Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Analysis of apoptosis in hematopoietic stem cells by flow cytometry.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 In Vitro Hematopoietic Differentiation of Murine Embryonic Stem Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Hematopoietic Development of Human Embryonic Stem Cells in Culture
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 In vitro human T cell development directed by notch-ligand interactions
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Hematopoietic Stem Cell Protocols
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Mice by Intra-Femoral Injection
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant into Non-Myeloablated W/W v Mice to Detect Steady-State Engraftment Defects
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Isolation and Functional Characterization of Side Population Stem Cells
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Transplantation of Chimeric Fetal Liver to Study Hematopoiesis
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Immunodeficient Mouse Models to Study Human Stem Cell-Mediated Tissue Repair
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Retroviral Transduction of Murine Hematopoietic Stem Cells
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Lentiviral Gene Transduction of Mouse and Human Stem Cells
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Retroviral Integration Site Analysis in Hematopoietic Stem Cells
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Hematopoietic Stem Cell Protocols
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Bioluminescence Imaging of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Repopulation in Murine Models
Attention for Chapter 6: Analysis of apoptosis in hematopoietic stem cells by flow cytometry.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Analysis of apoptosis in hematopoietic stem cells by flow cytometry.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/978-1-59745-182-6_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-868-3, 978-1-59745-182-6
Authors

Kerr WG, William G. Kerr

Abstract

Analysis of apoptosis can be used to assess aging and survival in the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) compartment in the context of disease, therapeutic manipulation, or genetic mutation. Two different methods to assess the frequency of apoptosis in the HSC compartment are presented. The first method utilizes an intracellular TUNEL assay that detects DNA strand breaks, a late apoptotic event. The second method relies on an extracellular stain with recombinant AnnexinV that detects flipping of phosphatidylserine groups to the outer membrane leaflet, an early apoptotic event. Both methods involve an initial magnetic enrichment or sorting of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells from whole bone marrow (BM). Magnetic sorting is followed by polychromatic antibody (Ab) stains that detect AnnexinV or TUNEL staining in the KFTLS or KTLS HSC phenotypes, respectively. Because of the intracellular detection required for the TUNEL assay, that procedure also includes cell fixation and permeabilization. Electronic gating strategies to assess the frequency of AnnexinV+ or TUNEL+ cells in KFTLS or KTLS HSC phenotypes are also described along with representative examples.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Unspecified 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,242,136
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,865
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,994
of 82,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.