↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic Applications of RNAi

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Therapeutic applications of RNAi for silencing virus replication.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Therapeutic applications of RNAi for silencing virus replication.
Chapter number 4
Book title
Therapeutic Applications of RNAi
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-295-7_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60327-294-0, 978-1-60327-295-7
Authors

Tripp RA, Tompkins SM, Ralph A. Tripp, Stephen Mark Tompkins

Abstract

RNA interference (RNAi) is an evolutionarily conserved gene-silencing mechanism in which small 19-23-nucleotide double-stranded RNA molecules, or small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), target cognate RNA for destruction with exquisite potency and selectivity. The RNAi machinery is believed to be expressed in all eukaryotic cells and has been shown to regulate host gene expression. Given this ability, RNAi silencing strategies have been developed to inhibit viral genes and replication in host cells. One area of growing interest is the development of synthetic siRNA drugs to target acute viral infections in which long-term gene silencing is not required or desirable. To achieve synthetic siRNA drug efficacy, these anti-viral agents need to be delivered to the appropriate host cells, as they do not readily cross the cell membrane. Varied delivery and siRNA chemical stabilization strategies are being investigated for siRNA drug delivery; however, several studies have shown that naked, unmodified siRNA drugs can be effective in silencing replication of some viruses in animal models of infection. These findings suggest that RNAi-based drugs may offer breakthrough technology to protect and treat humans and animals from viral infection. However, there are four major considerations for evaluating successful RNAi efficacy: the siRNAs must have high efficiency, show low cytotoxicity, result in minimal off-target effects, and lead to results that are reproducible between experiments. The methods and caveats to achieve these goals are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Other 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,223,099
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,860
of 13,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,831
of 168,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#151
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.