You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Assessing reprogramming by chimera formation and tetraploid complementation.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 18 |
| Book title |
Nuclear Reprogramming
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1594-1_18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1593-4, 978-1-4939-1594-1
|
| Authors |
Li X, Xia BL, Li W, Zhou Q, Xin Li, Bao-long Xia, Wei Li, Qi Zhou, Li, Xin, Xia, Bao-long, Li, Wei, Zhou, Qi |
| Abstract |
Pluripotent stem cells can be evaluated by pluripotent markers expression, embryoid body aggregation, teratoma formation, chimera contribution and even more, tetraploid complementation. Whether iPS cells in general are functionally equivalent to normal ESCs is difficult to establish. Here, we present the detailed procedure for chimera formation and tetraploid complementation, the most stringent criterion, to assessing pluripotency. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,380,628
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,871
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,216
of 255,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#67
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.