↓ Skip to main content

Chemogenomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Database systems for knowledge-based discovery.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Database systems for knowledge-based discovery.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Chemogenomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-274-2_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60761-273-5, 978-1-60761-274-2
Authors

Sarma A R P Jagarlapudi, K V Radha Kishan, Sarma A. R. P. Jagarlapudi, K. V. Radha Kishan, Jagarlapudi, Sarma A. R. P., Kishan, K. V. Radha

Abstract

Several database systems have been developed to provide valuable information from the bench chemist to biologist, medical practitioner to pharmaceutical scientist in a structured format. The advent of information technology and computational power enhanced the ability to access large volumes of data in the form of a database where one could do compilation, searching, archiving, analysis, and finally knowledge derivation. Although, data are of variable types the tools used for database creation, searching and retrieval are similar. GVK BIO has been developing databases from publicly available scientific literature in specific areas like medicinal chemistry, clinical research, and mechanism-based toxicity so that the structured databases containing vast data could be used in several areas of research. These databases were classified as reference centric or compound centric depending on the way the database systems were designed. Integration of these databases with knowledge derivation tools would enhance the value of these systems toward better drug design and discovery.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Mexico 2 8%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 19 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 21%
Chemistry 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Philosophy 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#5,865,494
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,704
of 13,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,943
of 168,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#51
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,086 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.