↓ Skip to main content

Epiblast Stem Cells

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Epiblast Stem Cells'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Generation and Characterization of Epiblast Stem Cells from Blastocyst-Stage Mouse Embryos
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Reversion of mouse postimplantation epiblast stem cells to a naïve pluripotent state by modulation of signalling pathways.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Converting Mouse Epiblast Stem Cells into Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells by Using Small Molecules
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Isolation and Culture of Rabbit Embryonic Stem Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Goat Embryonic Stem-Like Cell Derivation and Characterization
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Derivation and culture of canine embryonic stem cells.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Isolation and Culture of Porcine Embryonic Stem Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Isolation and Culture of Pig Epiblast Stem Cells
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Epiblast Stem Cells
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Analysis of Molecular Markers for Staging Peri-gastrulating Bovine Embryos
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Chicken Embryonic Stem Cells: Establishment and Characterization
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Manipulating the Avian Epiblast and Epiblast-Derived Stem Cells
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Stepwise differentiation from naïve state pluripotent stem cells to functional primordial germ cells through an epiblast-like state.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Isolation and Culture of Porcine Neural Progenitor Cells from Embryos and Pluripotent Stem Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Derivation of Neural Precursors from Bovine Preimplantation Embryos
Attention for Chapter 6: Derivation and culture of canine embryonic stem cells.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Derivation and culture of canine embryonic stem cells.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Epiblast Stem Cells
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-628-3_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-627-6, 978-1-62703-628-3
Authors

Tobias IC, Brooks CR, Teichroeb JH, Betts DH, Tobias, Ian C., Brooks, Courtney R., Teichroeb, Jonathan H., Betts, Dean H., Ian C. Tobias, Courtney R. Brooks, Jonathan H. Teichroeb, Dean H. Betts

Abstract

The derivation of canine embryonic stem cells (cESCs) represents a significant achievement and opens the door to further stem cell research and therapies in the dog. Canines share a common environment with humans and exhibit a host of genetic diseases, many of which have human parallels. Thus, the canine model presents unique advantages over other currently used organisms to help develop stem cell therapies in humans. To reveal the therapeutic potential of cESCs further basic research on the molecular mechanisms controlling their pluripotency and self-renewal characteristics is needed. Herein, we present the methods for derivation and culture of cESCs. Following collection of the canine blastocyst, two derivation methods are presented; immunodissection and whole blastocyst explant. These two methods lead to cESCs differing in morphology and subculture techniques. Additional protocols for subculture of established lines, feeder-free culture, and cryopreservation protocols are also described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 26%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,278,165
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,307
of 13,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,035
of 197,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#21
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.