↓ Skip to main content

Arenaviruses II

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Innate Immune Responses to LCMV Infections: Natural Killer Cells and Cytokines
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Innate Immune Responses to LCMV Infections: Natural Killer Cells and Cytokines
Chapter number 2
Book title
Arenaviruses II
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-56055-2_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-262724-8, 978-3-64-256055-2
Authors

C. A. Biron, K. B. Nguyen, G. C. Pien, Biron, C. A., Nguyen, K. B., Pien, G. C.

Abstract

Although much remains to be learned, the study of early responses to LCMV infections of mice has contributed to the basic understanding of the regulation of a variety of important innate immune responses. Major discoveries have included the appreciation of the levels of type 1 IFNs induced during endogenous responses to viral infections, the importance of IFN-alpha/beta for induction of NK cell cytotoxicity, and the roles for IFN-alpha/beta in regulating the expression of other innate cytokines, i.e., IL-12 and IFN-gamma produced by NK cells (Fig. 11). Taken together with the characterization of adaptive responses to LCMV, a paradigm is emerging for a possible initial to innate to adaptive response cascade during infections with viruses eliciting endogenous expression of high levels of IFN-alpha/beta. The results not only advance the understanding of endogenous responses to viral infections and how they are balanced to achieve the best possible outcome for the host, but also give insights into possible consequences of therapeutic intervention with type 1 IFNs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 30%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#201
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,543
of 396,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#13
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.