↓ Skip to main content

Chemosensory Systems in Mammals, Fishes, and Insects

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: The molecular evolution of teleost olfactory receptor gene families.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The molecular evolution of teleost olfactory receptor gene families.
Chapter number 11
Book title
Chemosensory Systems in Mammals, Fishes, and Insects
Published in
Results and problems in cell differentiation, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/400_2008_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-069918-7, 978-3-54-069919-4
Authors

Sigrun Korsching, Korsching, Sigrun

Abstract

Four olfactory receptor gene families, all of them G protein-coupled receptors, have been identified and characterized in mammals--the odorant (OR), vomeronasal (V1R and V2R) and trace amine-associated (TAARs) receptors. Much less attention has been directed towards non-mammalian members of these families. Since a hallmark of mammalian olfactory receptors is their remarkable species specificity, an evaluation of the non-mammalian olfactory receptors is instructive both for comparative purposes and in its own right. In this review I have compiled the results currently available for all four olfactory gene families and discuss their phylogenomic properties in relation to their mammalian counterparts. Representatives of all four families are found in cartilaginous fish and/or jawless fish, allowing a minimal estimate for the evolutionary origin as preceding the segregation between cartilaginous and bony fish or cartilaginous and jawless fish, respectively. Gene repertoires of teleost olfactory receptors are smaller in size (OR, ORA), comparable (olfC), or even larger (TAAR) than the corresponding mammalian gene repertoires. Despite their smaller repertoire size, the teleost OR and ORA families show much larger divergence than their mammalian counterparts. Evolutionary rates vary greatly between families, with evidence for positive selection in teleost OR genes, whereas the ora genes are subject to strong negative selection, and in fact are being conserved among all teleost species investigated. With one exception, ligands are unknown for any of the four teleost olfactory receptor gene families, and so the considerable knowledge about the odor responses of the olfactory epithelium and the olfactory bulb can only be linked indirectly to the receptor repertoires.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Master 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Neuroscience 5 13%
Psychology 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,318,407
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#145
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,329
of 184,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.