↓ Skip to main content

Water Soluble Vitamins

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Niacin status and genomic instability in bone marrow cells; mechanisms favoring the progression of leukemogenesis.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Niacin status and genomic instability in bone marrow cells; mechanisms favoring the progression of leukemogenesis.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Water Soluble Vitamins
Published in
Sub cellular biochemistry, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2199-9_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-072198-2, 978-9-40-072199-9
Authors

Kirkland JB, James B. Kirkland, Kirkland, James B.

Abstract

Niacin deficiency causes dramatic genomic instability in bone marrow cells in an in vivo rat model. The end result is seen in the increased incidence of sister chromatid exchanges, micronuclei, chromosomal aberrations and the eventual development of nitrosourea-induced leukemias. From a mechanistic perspective, niacin deficiency delays excision repair and causes double strand break accumulation, which in turn favor chromosome breaks and translocations. Niacin deficiency also impairs cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in response to DNA damage, which combine to encourage the survival of cells with leukemogenic potential. Niacin deficiency also enhances the level of oxidant damage found in cellular proteins and DNA, but not through depression of GSH levels. Pharmacological supplementation of niacin decreases the development of nitrosourea-induced leukemias, while short term effects of high niacin intake include a large increase in cellular NAD+ and poly(ADP-ribose) content and enhanced apoptosis. These results are important to cancer patients, which tend to be niacin deficient, are exposed to large doses of genotoxic drugs, and suffer short-term bone marrow suppression and long-term development of secondary leukemias. The data from our rat model suggest that niacin supplementation of cancer patients may decrease the severity of short and long-term side effects, and may also improve tumor cell killing through activation of poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent apoptosis pathways.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#18,314,181
of 23,534,053 outputs
Outputs from Sub cellular biochemistry
#238
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,402
of 243,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sub cellular biochemistry
#24
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,534,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.