↓ Skip to main content

Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction to viral vectors.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Introduction to Gene Therapy: A Clinical Aftermath
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Host Cells and Cell Banking
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Overview of Current Scalable Methods for Purification of Viral Vectors
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Methods to Construct Recombinant Adenovirus Vectors
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Manufacturing of Adenovirus Vectors: Production and Purification of Helper Dependent Adenovirus
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Manufacturing of retroviruses.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Adeno-Associated Viruses
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Manufacturing of Adeno-Associated Viruses, for Example: AAV2
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Vector Characterization Methods for Quality Control Testing of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viruses
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Baculoviruses Mediate Efficient Gene Expression in a Wide Range of Vertebrate Cells
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1-Derived Recombinant and Amplicon Vectors
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Manufacture of measles viruses.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 In Vivo Gene Delivery into hCD34 + Cells in a Humanized Mouse Model
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 In Vivo Evaluation of Gene Transfer into Mesenchymal Cells (In View of Cartilage Repair)
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Ethical Consideration
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Clinical Trials of GMP Products in the Gene Therapy Field
Attention for Chapter 1: Introduction to viral vectors.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 14,333)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
20 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Introduction to viral vectors.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-095-9_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-094-2, 978-1-61779-095-9
Authors

Warnock JN, Daigre C, Al-Rubeai M, James N. Warnock, Claire Daigre, Mohamed Al-Rubeai, Warnock, James N., Daigre, Claire, Al-Rubeai, Mohamed

Abstract

Viral vector is the most effective means of gene transfer to modify specific cell type or tissue and can be manipulated to express therapeutic genes. Several virus types are currently being investigated for use to deliver genes to cells to provide either transient or permanent transgene expression. These include adenoviruses (Ads), retroviruses (γ-retroviruses and lentiviruses), poxviruses, adeno-associated viruses, baculoviruses, and herpes simplex viruses. The choice of virus for routine clinical use will depend on the efficiency of transgene expression, ease of production, safety, toxicity, and stability. This chapter provides an introductory overview of the general characteristics of viral vectors commonly used in gene transfer and their advantages and disadvantages for gene therapy use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 290 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 21%
Student > Master 47 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 15%
Researcher 15 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 3%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 99 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 5%
Engineering 12 4%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 104 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#678,259
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#43
of 14,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,404
of 124,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.