Chapter title |
Practices in Molecular Docking and Structure-Based Virtual Screening
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 3 |
Book title |
Computational Drug Discovery and Design
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7756-7_3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7755-0, 978-1-4939-7756-7
|
Authors |
Ricardo N. dos Santos, Leonardo G. Ferreira, Adriano D. Andricopulo |
Abstract |
Drug discovery has evolved significantly over the past two decades. Progress in key areas such as molecular and structural biology has contributed to the elucidation of the three-dimensional structure and function of a wide range of biological molecules of therapeutic interest. In this context, the integration of experimental techniques, such as X-ray crystallography, and computational methods, such as molecular docking, has promoted the emergence of several areas in drug discovery, such as structure-based drug design (SBDD). SBDD strategies have been broadly used to identify, predict and optimize the activity of small molecules toward a molecular target and have contributed to major scientific breakthroughs in pharmaceutical R&D. This chapter outlines molecular docking and structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) protocols used to predict the interaction of small molecules with the phosphatidylinositol-bisphosphate-kinase PI3Kδ, which is a molecular target for hematological diseases. A detailed description of the molecular docking and SBVS procedures and an evaluation of the results are provided. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 37 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 11% |
Chemistry | 10 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 46 | 41% |