↓ Skip to main content

Chromothripsis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Chromothripsis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The Genomic Characteristics and Origin of Chromothripsis
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Clinical Consequences of Chromothripsis and Other Catastrophic Cellular Events
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Potential Role of Chromothripsis in the Genesis of Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements in Human Gametes and Preimplantation Embryo
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Chromothripsis and the Macroevolution Theory
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Analysis of Chromothripsis by Combined FISH and Microarray Analysis
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Chromothripsis Detectable in Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes (sSMC) Using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Identification of Chromothripsis in Biopsy Using SNP-Based Microarray
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Detection of Chromothripsis in Plants
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 RNA-Seq Analysis to Detect Abnormal Fusion Transcripts Linked to Chromothripsis
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Experimental Determination of Checkpoint Adaptation by Mitotic Shake-Off and Microscopy
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A Role for Retrotransposons in Chromothripsis
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Generation of Micronuclei and Detection of Chromosome Pulverization
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Detection of Impaired DNA Replication and Repair in Micronuclei as Indicators of Genomic Instability and Chromothripsis
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Study of Telomere Dysfunction in TP53 Mutant LoVo Cell Lines as a Model for Genomic Instability
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Genes, Proteins, and Biological Pathways Preventing Chromothripsis
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Expression of Genes Associated with Telomere Homeostasis in TP53 Mutant LoVo Cell Lines as a Model for Genomic Instability
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Chromothripsis Detection and Characterization Using the CTLPScanner Web Server
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 ChromothripsisDB: A Curated Database for the Documentation, Visualization, and Mining of Chromothripsis Data
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Time-Lapse Imaging for the Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Primate Preimplantation Embryos
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Correlative Live Imaging and Immunofluorescence for Analysis of Chromosome Segregation in Mouse Preimplantation Embryos
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Experimental Induction of Genome Chaos
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Looking for Broken TAD Boundaries and Changes on DNA Interactions: Clinical Guide to 3D Chromatin Change Analysis in Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements and Chromothripsis
Attention for Chapter 19: Time-Lapse Imaging for the Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Primate Preimplantation Embryos
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Time-Lapse Imaging for the Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Primate Preimplantation Embryos
Chapter number 19
Book title
Chromothripsis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7780-2_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7779-6, 978-1-4939-7780-2
Authors

Brittany L. Daughtry, Shawn L. Chavez, Daughtry, Brittany L., Chavez, Shawn L.

Abstract

The use of time-lapse microscopic imaging has proven to be a powerful tool for the study of mitotic divisions and other cellular processes across diverse species and cell types. Although time-lapse monitoring (TLM) of human preimplantation development was first introduced to the in vitro fertilization (IVF) community several decades ago, it was not until relatively recently that TLM systems were commercialized for clinical embryology purposes. Traditionally, human IVF embryos are assessed by successful progression and morphology under a stereomicroscope at distinct time points prior to selection for transfer. Due to the high frequency of aneuploidy, embryos may also be biopsied at the cleavage or blastocyst stage for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) of whole and/or partial chromosomal abnormalities. However, embryo biopsy is invasive and can hinder subsequent development, and there are additional concerns over chromosomal mosaicism and resolution with PGS. Moreover, embryos are typically outside of the incubator in suboptimal culture conditions for extended periods of time during these procedures. With TLM systems, embryos remain in the stable microenvironment of an incubator and are simultaneously imaged for noninvasive embryo evaluation using a fraction of the light exposure as compared to a stereomicroscope. Each image is then compiled into a time-lapse movie, the information from which can be extrapolated to correlate morphological, spatial, and temporal parameters with embryo quality and copy number status. Here, we describe the various TLM systems available for clinical and/or research use in detail and provide step-by-step instructions on how the measurement of specific timing intervals and certain morphological criteria can be implemented into IVF protocols to enhance embryo assessment and avoid the selection of aneuploid embryos. We also discuss the biological significance of processes unique to mitotically dividing embryos and the likelihood that complex chromosomal events such as chromothripsis occur during preimplantation development in humans and other mammals, particularly nonhuman primates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Psychology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,594,219
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,974
of 13,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,599
of 442,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.