↓ Skip to main content

Cancer: Cell Structures, Carcinogens and Genomic Instability

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Metal ions and carcinogenesis.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Metal ions and carcinogenesis.
Chapter number 5
Book title
Cancer: Cell Structures, Carcinogens and Genomic Instability
Published in
EXS, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/3-7643-7378-4_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-76-437156-2, 978-3-76-437378-8
Authors

Durham TR, Snow ET, Durham, Troy R., Snow, Elizabeth T., Troy R. Durham, Elizabeth T. Snow

Abstract

Metals are essential for the normal functioning of living organisms. Their uses in biological systems are varied, but are frequently associated with sites of critical protein function, such as zinc finger motifs and electron or oxygen carriers. These functions only require essential metals in minute amounts, hence they are termed trace metals. Other metals are, however, less beneficial, owing to their ability to promote a wide variety of deleterious health effects, including cancer. Metals such as arsenic, for example, can produce a variety of diseases ranging from keratosis of the palms and feet to cancers in multiple target organs. The nature and type of metal-induced pathologies appear to be dependent on the concentration, speciation, and length of exposure. Unfortunately, human contact with metals is an inescapable consequence of human life, with exposures occurring from both occupational and environmental sources. A uniform mechanism of action for all harmful metals is unlikely, if not implausible, given the diverse chemical properties of each metal. In this chapter we will review the mechanisms of carcinogenesis of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and nickel, the four known carcinogenic metals that are best understood. The key areas of speciation, bioavailability, and mechanisms of action are discussed with particular reference to the role of metals in alteration of gene expression and maintenance of genomic integrity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 14%
Researcher 7 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 32%
Chemistry 10 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#20,714,793
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from EXS
#81
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,842
of 155,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EXS
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.