↓ Skip to main content

Drug Delivery Systems

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: pH-responsive nanoparticles for cancer drug delivery.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
pH-responsive nanoparticles for cancer drug delivery.
Chapter number 10
Book title
Drug Delivery Systems
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/978-1-59745-210-6_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-891-1, 978-1-59745-210-6
Authors

Shen Y, Tang H, Radosz M, Van Kirk E, Murdoch WJ, Youqing Shen, Huadong Tang, Maciej Radosz, Edward Van Kirk, William J. Murdoch, Shen, Youqing, Tang, Huadong, Radosz, Maciej, Van Kirk, Edward, Murdoch, William J.

Abstract

Solid tumors have an acidic extracellular environment and an altered pH gradient across their cell compartments. Nanoparticles responsive to the pH gradients are promising for cancer drug delivery. Such pH-responsive nanoparticles consist of a corona and a core, one or both of which respond to the external pH to change their soluble/insoluble or charge states. Nanoparticles whose coronas become positively charged or become soluble to make their targeting groups available for binding at the tumor extracellular pH have been developed for promoting cellular targeting and internalization. Nanoparticles whose cores become soluble or change their structures to release the carried drugs at the tumor extracellular pH or lysosomal pH have been developed for fast drug release into the extracellular fluid or cytosol. Such pH-responsive nanoparticles have therapeutic advantages over the conventional pH-insensitive counterparts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Russia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 182 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 24%
Student > Master 38 20%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 10 5%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 36 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 10%
Materials Science 16 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 45 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,616,041
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,590
of 13,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,153
of 82,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#16
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,045 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.