↓ Skip to main content

Biological removal of nitrogen from wastewater.

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological removal of nitrogen from wastewater.
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-71724-1_5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guibing Zhu, Yongzhen Peng, Baikun Li, Jianhua Guo, Qing Yang, Shuying Wang

Abstract

This comprehensive review discusses diverse conventional and novel technologies for nitrogen removal from wastewater. Novel technologies have distinct advantages in terms of saving configuration, aeration, and carbon sources. Each novel technology possesses promising features and potential problems. For instance, SND and OLAND processes can achieve 100% total nitrogen removal, but the low oxygen concentration required by these two processes substantially reduces the nitrification rate, which limits their application. On the other hand, denitrification can still be carried out by aerobic denitrifiers at high DO levels in activated sludge process, but it is difficult to cultivate this type of bacteria. The SHARON process is most commonly used for shortcut nitrification and denitrification because of its low requirements for retention time, oxygen concentration, and carbon source. However, its high operational temperature (about 35 degrees C) limits the application. Several real-time control strategies (DO, pH, and ORP) have been developed to achieve a stable nitrite accumulation in SHARON. The ANAMMOX process can sustain at high total-N loadings and has been employed in full-scale treatment plants, but the problem of nitrite supply has not been solved, and the treated wastewater still contains nitrate. In addition, the inoculation and enrichment of ANAMMOX bacteria (i.e., anaerobic AOB) is difficult. The problem of nitrite supply has been solved by combining partial nitrification with ANAMMOX, which provides abundant nitrite for anaerobic AOB. ANAMMOX is currently used for treating sludge digestion supernatant. Aerobic dammonitrification is a process combining partial nitrification and ANAMMOX at different layers of biofilm. Although the technology has been tested in pilot- and full-scale experiments, the mechanism is still unclear. CANON and OLAND are one-step ammonium removal processes that possess distinct advantages of saving carbon sources and aeration costs. The major challenge is the enrichment of anaerobic microorganisms capable of oxidizing ammonia with nitrite as the electron acceptor. Molecular biology and environmental biotechnology can help identify functional microorganisms, characterize microbial communities, and develop new nitrogen removal processes. Extensive research should be conducted to apply and optimize these novel processes in wastewater treatment plants. More effort should be invested to combine these novel processes (e.g., partial nitrification, ANAMMOX) to enhance nitrogen removal efficiency.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 315 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 19%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 67 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 68 21%
Environmental Science 64 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 10%
Chemical Engineering 16 5%
Chemistry 16 5%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 87 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2008.
All research outputs
#8,717,005
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#82
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,132
of 170,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.