↓ Skip to main content

Torpor and basking in a small arid zone marsupial

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Torpor and basking in a small arid zone marsupial
Published in
The Science of Nature, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00114-007-0293-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Warnecke, James M. Turner, Fritz Geiser

Abstract

The high energetic cost associated with endothermic rewarming from torpor is widely seen as a major disadvantage of torpor. We tested the hypothesis that small arid zone marsupials, which have limited access to energy in the form of food but ample access to solar radiation, employ basking to facilitate arousal from torpor and reduce the costs of rewarming. We investigated torpor patterns and basking behaviour in free-ranging fat-tailed dunnarts Sminthopsis crassicaudata (10 g) in autumn and winter using small, internal temperature-sensitive transmitters. Torpid animals emerged from their resting sites in cracking soil at approximately 1000 h with body temperatures as low as 14.6 degrees C and positioned themselves in the sun throughout the rewarming process. On average, torpor duration in autumn was shorter, and basking was less pronounced in autumn than in winter. These are the first observations of basking during rewarming in S. crassicaudata and only the second direct evidence of basking in a torpid mammal for the reduction of energetic costs during arousal from torpor and normothermia. Our findings suggest that although overlooked in the past, basking may be widely distributed amongst heterothermic mammals. Therefore, the energetic benefits from torpor use in wild animals may currently be underestimated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 4%
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
China 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 64 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 22%
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 66%
Environmental Science 7 10%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,800,107
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#249
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,462
of 68,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.