↓ Skip to main content

Antiviral Strategies

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Viral protease inhibitors.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Viral protease inhibitors.
Chapter number 4
Book title
Antiviral Strategies
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-79086-0_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-079085-3, 978-3-54-079086-0
Authors

Jeffrey Anderson, Celia Schiffer, Sook-Kyung Lee, Ronald Swanstrom, Anderson J, Schiffer C, Lee SK, Swanstrom R, Anderson, Jeffrey, Schiffer, Celia, Lee, Sook-Kyung, Swanstrom, Ronald

Abstract

This review provides an overview of the development of viral protease inhibitors as antiviral drugs. We concentrate on HIV-1 protease inhibitors, as these have made the most significant advances in the recent past. Thus, we discuss the biochemistry of HIV-1 protease, inhibitor development, clinical use of inhibitors, and evolution of resistance. Since many different viruses encode essential proteases, it is possible to envision the development of a potent protease inhibitor for other viruses if the processing site sequence and the catalytic mechanism are known. At this time, interest in developing inhibitors is limited to viruses that cause chronic disease, viruses that have the potential to cause large-scale epidemics, or viruses that are sufficiently ubiquitous that treating an acute infection would be beneficial even if the infection was ultimately self-limiting. Protease inhibitor development is most advanced for hepatitis C virus (HCV), and we also provide a review of HCV NS3/4A serine protease inhibitor development, including combination therapy and resistance. Finally, we discuss other viral proteases as potential drug targets, including those from Dengue virus, cytomegalovirus, rhinovirus, and coronavirus.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 16%
Chemistry 17 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 46 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#225
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,752
of 400,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#20
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.